Validated Models of MapReduce Scaling
The premise of parallel computing is to divide large jobs up into smaller tasks which are serviced in parallel by several servers. The premise is intuitive, but there are a range of different models for parallel computation, and seemingly small differences in the relationships between queues, servers, and arrival and service processes can lead to drastically different scaling properties.
The current dominance of the MapReduce architecture, and the implementation of many processing engines based on it, leads us to seek to understand the behavior and scaling of these systems at a fundamental level. There is a choice of abstract models for parallelized systems, ranging from the Split-Merge model which has very unfavorable scaling properties, to the Fork-Join model which has been a popular subject of analysis, to the Non-Idling Single-Queue model which is more representative of a MapReduce task manager and sees very good gains from load-balancing. In fact, depending on how a MapReduce program is implemented, it can exhibit scaling behavior ranging from Split-Merge, to Non-Idling Single-Queue.
Ideally, having k parallel servers would make execution of any job k times faster, but, both in theory and in practice, this ideal is difficult to achieve. The key feature that keeps these parallel systems from having ideal scaling behavior is an irregular division of work between the tasks. Under most models a job is not complete until all of its tasks finish service. Therefore one disproportionate, or "straggler", task can dominate the job sojourn time. Similarly, a task stuck in a queue behind a straggler task from another job will dominate its job's sojourn time. If all tasks had identical service times, a parallel system would behave like a conventional queue. In analytical models, in order to strike the balance between tractability and triviality of the problem, researchers usually assume that the service times of the tasks are independent random variables from one of the common distributions.
We propose a research plan to investigate, both empirically and theoretically, the applicability of both a variety of models of parallel computing, and models for the division of jobs into tasks, on real MapReduce systems. This line of research is compelling because existing research tends to be divergent, either focusing mainly on details of realistic, but very complex MapReduce systems, or on analytical models with queueing and service time distributions that may or may not be realistic enough to give meaningful results. We also propose to use the results of our investigation to prototype new MapReduce task management and resource management schemes.
- Markus Fidler, Brenton Walker, Yuming Jiang (2018); Non-Asymptotic Delay Bounds for Multi-Server Systems with Synchronization Constraints; IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS), vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1-1
- Brenton Walker (2017); Benchmarking and Simulating the Fundamental Scaling Behaviors of a MapReduce Engine; IFIP NETWORKING 2017 - Workshop on Information Centric Fog Computing, Stockholm, Sweden, Jun. 2017
- Markus Fidler, Brenton Walker, Yuming Jiang (2016); Non-Asymptotic Delay Bounds for Multi-Server Systems with Synchronization Constraints; (arXiv) Oct. 2016
- Markus Fidler, Yuming Jiang (2016); Non-asymptotic delay bounds for (k, l) fork-join systems and multi-stage fork-join networks; IEEE INFOCOM 2016; San Francisco, CA, USA, Jun. 2016
We have an open position for a Wissenshaftlicher Mitarbeiter (PhD student). Here is the formal job announcement (in German).
The VaMoS project is funded by the DFG.